Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for behavioral addictions: a preliminary analysis of an ongoing randomised controlled trial

Wednesday, 23 October, 2019 - 15:00 to 16:30
Guided poster tours room


Background: Mindfulness based interventions (MBI) can potentially improve impulsivity, alexithymia and emotion regulation. The aim of this study is to explore the efficacy of MBI in improving these factors in Gambling Disorder (GD) and Hypersexual Disorder (HD) and to analyse differences between both groups. Method: The sample comprised GD and HD patients (n=12) who were assessed according to the DSM-5 criteria and received outpatient treatment at the Behavioral Addictions Program within the Addictive Behaviors Unit of a public hospital. The MBI for GD consisted in 14-weekly outpatient enhanced-CBT with Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP) group sessions. The MBI for HD consisted in individual CBT sessions and 8-weekly MBRP group sessions. Main outcomes were GD and HD DSM-5 Criteria, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20; Bagby, Parker, & Taylor, 1994), Difficulties in Emotion Eegulation Scale (DERS; Gratz & Roemer, 2004) and UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale (Lynam et al., 2006). Repeated measures ANOVA was realized based on a mixed model of one between-subjects factor (type of behavioural addiction) with two categories (GD and HD) and one within-subjects factor (time factor) with two repeated measures (pre- and post-treatment assessments). Results: Results showed statistically significant differences between GD and HD groups in TAS Identification scale both in time effect [F(1, 10) = 4.972; p = 0.049; partial ?2=0.332] and in time X group interaction [F(1, 10) = 4.972; p = 0.049; partial ?2 = 0.332]. Differences were also statistically significant for the UPPS-P Negative Urgency scale in the time X group interaction [F(1,10) = 6.079; p = 0.033; partial ?2 = 0.378]. No significant differences were found in the remaining measures. Conclusions: Preliminary results of the present study showed that mindfulness-based treatment improved the tendency to act rashly when distressed and the the ability to identify emotions in GD but not in HD. However, the differences observed between groups can be explained by the small sample size and we aim to re-run the analyses once the sample is bigger.


Presentation files

EP893Marta Sancho Navarro.pdf592.57 KBDownload



Part of session